Newton-in-Makerfield in the Victorian Era

[radman]

In 1930 the Earlestown Guardian ran a series of articles looking back to 1884, it's mostly trivia, but it does give you a feeling for what was important locally at the time. I will be posting them in month sized chunks over the next few weeks.

I decided against posting them in Steven's "Old News and Horrible Histories" thread as I think it'll be good to have them contained as a series "together", plus there's not much that's horrible in them, so far

here's January :--

Liverpool Press Guard, in accordance with the long honoured custom, assembled to hold their New Year prize meeting on January 1st, 1884. Thanks to the generous sympathy of the local tradesmen and others (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of January 5th, 1884) an excellent prize list was produced, for which the shooting was very keen, although, owing to the extreme cold, and rather prolonged waiting on Highfield Moss, the scoring was not of the highest order. Still, good averages were made. The winners of the first and second prizes were Corporal Sutton and Private R. Wright, both of Earlestown. There were 61 competitors, each of whom received a prize according to merit. The shooting should have commenced at 10:30 a.m., but the but the weather being extremely open the farmers in the vicinity of the range were very busy, which prevented the practice commencing before 1:30 p.m., when, through the kindness of Mr. Marsh, Lowton, who at that hour discontinued working, the match was enabled to be shot through, and concluded at 3:30 p.m.

At seven o’clock several of the non-commissioned officers and friends assembled at the Legh Arms Hotel to dine together, a custom which had been carried on successfully for the previous four or five years. About 30 sat down to dinner, under the general presidency of Colour-Sergeant H. Houghton, and after dinner a most enjoyable evening was passed. The usual practice and customary toasts were heartily proposed by the chairman, occasionally assisted by Sergeant Bateman, and were as heartily drunk and responded to, after which singing and elocutionary items were enjoyed by the company. George Wright was responsible for capital songs and Corporal Sutton, Sergeant Roberts, and Sergeant Bateman also gave stirring items. Time brought a very enjoyable evening to a regretted conclusion.

The death of Mr. T. W. Barker (Coroner) stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of January 5th, 1884, has created a vacancy the filling of which rests with the freeholders resident in the district. Mr. Lever R. Rowbottom, solicitor, of Wigan, has issued his address. Mr. Rowbottom has for nearly 10 years been coroner for the Borough of Wigan, and has been deputy to Mr. Barker. It was stated that other probable candidates would be Mr. W. Hardy (barrister) and Mr. Riley (solicitor), of St. Helens, the latter having been in the field when Mr. Barker was appointed.

At a special meeting of the Warrington Board of Guardians on Saturday, December 28th, 1883, the appointment of a Vaccination Officer for the Newton registration sub-district was made. The applicants were: Mr. Joseph Caldwell, relieving officer, Newton; Mr. George Howarth, dairyman, Earlestown; Mr. Alfred Cooper, night watchman, Earlestown; Mr. Robert Upton, Warrington; and Mr. Fred Pennington, Newton. It appeared that Mr. Howarth after applying for this post wrote to the Clerk pointing out the unpopularity which would follow active prosecution, suggesting that this would be disastrous to a man in business. In answer to Major Cartwright he now stated that he should not be disappointed if he did not obtain the situation. (Laughter). Mr. Cooper was unanimously elected and promised to do his best to please the Guardians.

At the monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners, held at the Newton Town Hall on Monday, January 7th, 1884, there were present Messrs. J. W. Emmett (Chairman), George McCorquodale, J. P., T. J. Gillespie J. P., Pardey, Hunt, Forster, Glover, Fairclough, Mr. Worsley (Law Clerk), and the Surveyor (Mr. Brierley).

The Law Clerk reported that a salt hawker named James Carney, who defied the Commissioners by selling his salt on the Earlestown Market Ground without paying toll, had on the day after the last meeting of the Commissioners, again offered his salt for sale on the Market in defiance of the Commissioners. Carney already owed a toll of 6d., for which they summoned him before the magistrates, and in which the magistrates’ clerk advised them that they had no jurisdiction. Mr. Worsley said he had stated a case for counsel on the facts, in accordance with the decision of the Commissioners, and he had forwarded it together with all the necessary papers and documents. To this counsel had not yet replied.
The Law Clerk stated that he had written a strong appeal to the Local Government Board asking them to forward their report upon the late visit of the inspector with regard to the Cemetery.

He also reported that he had written a letter to the Clerk of the Peace on the question of the County’s liability for a proportion of the cost of repairing and maintaining main roads, and informing them that counsel’s opinion had been taken on the matter. To this he had received a reply that the letter would be laid before the County justices on the 12th March following.

The third annual ball of the Newton Football Club was held in the Town Hall, on Friday, January 11th, 1884, about 60 couples attending. The refreshments were supplied by Mr. Walmsley of the Legh Arms Hotel, and music for dancing by Mr. J. Stirrup’s band. The decorations were carried out by Mr. E. T. Evans. The committee who had the arrangements in hand were: Messrs: J. Boardman, T. Braddock, A. T. Croughton, R. Hitchen, G. Lane, G. Fitzgerald, W. W. C. Mee, G. McCormick, F. Willis, and T. Fairclough (hon. secretary).

The 14 days’ notice posted at Mr. Brewis’s Mill, Golborne (said the “Earlestown Guardian” of January 12th, 1884) for an all-round reduction of 10 per cent, on the plea of bad trade, is expected to result in a general strike, as the hands affirm that they are already much below the Blackburn and other lists. The hands were so indignant that when the notices were posted at the mill they were torn down. There are over one thousand employed, two-thirds of them being weavers, and almost exclusively females.

The first annual dinner and social gathering of the clerk of the Viaduct Works, Earlestown, was held at Mr. Walmsley’s Legh Arms Hotel, Newton on Friday evening (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of January 26th, 1884), the number present being 16. Mr. Ashton occupied the chair, and Mr. Tootil the vice-chair, Mr. Davies presiding at the piano. After the loyal and patriotic toasts, the Chairman proposed “Prosperity to the L. & N. W. Railway Co.,” which was responded to with a full bumper. The next toast “The officers and clerks of the Wagon Department,” was responded to by Mr. Tootil. The following programme was also gone through: -- song, “The Arab’s farewell to his steed,” Mr. Owen; comic song, “Quips the Quaker,” Mr. Liversage; Lancashire reading, “Ben ‘Pinders,” Mr. Ormand; song, “The Village Blacksmith,” Mr. Davies; reading, Mr. Ashton; song, “Dream Faces,” Mr. Owen; song, “Little Brown Jug,” Mr. Porter; song, “The Old Brigade,” Mr. Gowanlock; comic song, “Tiddly-fol-lol,” Mr. Ball. The company spent a very enjoyable evening.

The annual ball of the “C” Troop of Lancashire Hussars and 9th and 19th Rifle Volunteers, was held in the Town Hall, Newton, on Friday evening, January 18th, 1884. The attendance included about 100 couples, and dancing was kept up until an early hour on Saturday morning. Sergt.-Inst. Parks and Sergt. Percival officiated as M.C.’s.
The refreshments were supplied by Mr. Bond, of the Pied Bull Hotel. The committee of management comprised Quartermaster-Sergt. Howard, Farrier-Sergt. Ritchie, Pte. Hope, Sergt.-Inst. McCoy, Sergt. Dolan, Sergt. Aitken, Corporal Fitzgerald, Lance-Sergt. Bateman, Lance-Corporal Goff, Sergt. Moister, with Colour-Sergt. Haselden and Corporal Mayor as hon. Secretaries, and Colour-Sergt. Houghton as treasurer. The following officers and gentlemen were present during the evening. Captain A. D. Seton, Captain J. L. Wood, Captain H. Thomson, Lieut. H. F. Gooch, Mr. E Raymond Osgood, Mr. N. McCorquodale, Mr. J. S. Thompson, and Mr. A. J. Lucy. The assembly was a great success.

The newly erected railway bridge at Earlestown Station (wrote a contributor to the “Earlestown Guardian” of January 26th, 1884) makes my movements both graceful and angelic. I perform the “goose step” admirably when ascending or descending on either side, and when I get to the top the nor-easters blow me unmercifully from one side to another, and to protect my hat I put it over my eyes as if to cut my acquaintance with the police. This bridge is more unsightly than the subterranean passage at Newton, which foreigners are liable to mistake for a Roman catacomb. I’m so out of conceit with this bridge that, in future, its crossing by me will be more honoured in the breach than in the observance.

[radman]

Here's February...

At a meeting of the Newton Commissioners held on Monday, February 4th, 1884, there were present; Mr. Gooch (Chairman), Col. McCorquodole, Messrs. T. Stone, J. W. Emmett, T. Hunt, T. Forster and J. E. Pardy, Mr. Worsley (Law Clerk), Mr. Brierley (Clerk and Surveyor) and Dr. Watkins (Medical Officer of Health).

The Law Clerk read the minutes of a special meeting held January 31st, called for the purpose of altering the proposed shape and area of the new cemetery. It had been decided to reduce the area from 10½ to 8 acres and the surveyor had prepared the plans of the alteration and submitted them to Mr. Legh’s solicitors, and the Law Clerk and Surveyor were instructed to proceed to London in support of the matter. Mr. Pardey had expressed the opinion that nothing could be done until another enquiry was held and the sanction of the ratepayers obtained to the alteration. The Law Clerk said that in the opinion of the Commissioners this sanction was not necessary. To the amended plan, Mr. Pardey suggested a right of road be given Mr. Legh, that cattle might be driven across the private road leading to the cemetery, close to the entrance gate. The Surveyor said that nothing was said about severance of the original arrangement, and he believed the object of asking for a gate on each side of the private road was that cattle might be driven across without going on a highway, to avoid the restrictions of the cattle plague. The unanimous opinion was that cattle in being driven across might prove a nuisance, and the privilege might be taken advantage of in after time to make the passage a cart-way for carting manure or commodities. The meeting decided not to accede to the application.

The Law Clerk read a letter from the Local Government Board sanctioning the borrowing of £5,000 for the purposes of the new cemetery. The amount asked for was £6,000, but the Local Government Board expressed the opinion that £5,000 would be sufficient for the immediate requirements.

The Law Clerk stated that he had obtained counsel’s advice with regard to the refusal of James Carney, the salt hawker, to pay a toll of 9d. for hawking his salt in the streets of the township. It was, after discussion, decided to enter the case in the County Court, the claim to be for a toll of 9d., and £5 for disturbance of the market.

The annual ploughing match of the Newton-in-Makerfield Ploughing Society took place on Thursday (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of February 9th, 1884) on Mr. T. Stone’s Newton Park Farm. The dinner was held at Mr. Bond’s Pied Bull Hotel, Newton, the Hon. William Gerard, eldest son of Lord Gerard, occupying the chair, and being supported by Mr. Pardey and Mr. T. Stone. About 100 farmers were present. The first prize (open – all England) was awarded to John Walker, Ditton, and the first prize in the district class to John Bent, Golborne, With Edward Eckers, Upholland, second, and Robert Eckersley, Lowton, third.

On Wednesday night, February 20th, 1884, a fire broke out at Haydock Lodge Asylum, raging over three hours and doing damage to the extent of several thousands of pounds. Fortunately (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of that week) the wind was blowing very strongly in a favourable direction or the whole place would probably have been gutted. The fire was first discovered about nine o’clock, and the place of its origin was in the drying room. The fire bell was rung and this brought Sergt. Savage and five constables from Ashton on the scene. Afterwards the Ashton fire brigade arrived, followed later by the Newton fire brigade. Sergt. Savage (Ashton), Sergt. Cummings (Ashton), and Sergt. Develin (Haydock) assisted by a number of constables, worked hard, but it was not until half past one that they succeeded in getting the fire under! The inmates were removed to a part of the buildings farthest from the flames, where there was no danger of loss of life. A Large crowd gathered to watch the conflagration and one man had his leg broken whilst trying to get out of the way of a horse which had taken fright.

On Monday, February 18th, 1884, the Newton-le-Willows Choral Society rendered, on the occasion of their annual concert, Sullivan’s cantata, “Shore and Sea,” in Newton Town Hall. In addition to the piece named, songs, etc., were sung. The hall was crowded. Mr. P. Fairclough conducted and also acted as accompanist in some of the pieces. Mr. J. H. Greenwood, the eminent humorous vocalist, was the general accompanist. The principal solos were taken by Miss Roberts and Mr. J. Owen, and other singers were Miss Grace, Miss Stone, Miss Liptrot, Mr. W. Haskell, Misses Rees, Turner, and Atkin, Mr. Howard, Miss Rose. Mr. Greenwood have humorous selections.

After a strike lasting six weeks, notices were posted at Brewis’s Mill, Golborne, to the effect that the works would be opened on the old terms. Judging by the smiling faces and jocular conversation at the closing meeting of the workers (where a general resumption was recommended) it seemed (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of February 23rd, 1884) as if everyone was satisfied with the result of the struggle. It was decided to form a union to protect the interests of the workers in the future.

The adjourned inquiry concerning the death of William Tasker (76), a late workman in the employ of the railway company at the Earlestown Viaduct Wagon Works, was resumed at the Viaduct Hotel on Monday, February 18th, 1884, before Mr. S. Brighouse. After further cross examination of the witnesses, the Coroner reviewed the whole of the evidence and said that if the jury came to the conclusion that the fall from the ladder did not cause peritonitis then it would be their duty to bring in a verdict of “Death from natural causes.” After deliberating for three-quarters of an hour, the jury announced that they were unable to agree. The Coroner, however, refused to listen to this and ordered them to be shut up in the room until they did. Ultimately the following verdict was returned: “That the deceased died from Peritonitis, but there was no evidence to show how it was caused.”

There was a big crowd at Earlestown on Saturday, February 16th, 1884, when Earlestown met Bootle in a cup tie (Bootle being the holders), and defeated the holders by four goals to none. The Earlestown team was captained by R. Green, and was as follows:– T. Champion, goal; R. Green and F. Emmett, full backs; J. Whalley, R. Bowker, and J. Duxuxbury, halves; W. Rich, J. Ellison, A. Dagnall, J. Simm, and J. Cameron, forwards. Dagnall, who was in splendid form, scored the first goal for Earlestown after 12 minutes play, amidst the greatest excitement and enthusiasm. Earlestown kept the ball in the neighbourhood of the Bootle citadel, and Dagnall beat Jones for the second time. This wakened the visitors up and they realised that they had something more on hand than they had anticipated. With a machine-like precision they stormed the Earlestown goal, but Green, Emmett and Champion put up a capital defence, and before long transferred play once more into the Bootle half. After another rally, Dagnall performed the “hat-trick” by scoring his third goal for Earlestown, and close on half-time, Ellison added a fourth from a corner kick. In the second half, Earlestown packed their goal, playing three backs and four forwards. Bootle made desperate efforts to score but Champion played a wonderful game and the visitors were eventually beaten pointless – four to none. For Bootle, E. A. Eyton-Jones, the Welsh International, was playing inside left.

[radman]

Here's March...

On Tuesday evening last (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of March 1st 1884) “one of the most successful local gatherings which have taken place for many years was celebrated in Newton Town Hall, the occasion being a grand ball in connection with the freemasons, under the auspices of the Lodge of Faith (No. 485, Ashton). It is nearly 40 years since a similar gathering was held in the neighbourhood. The number present would be about 70 couples, the Freemasons being attired in full Masonic dress, wearing the respective badges of their rank. There were also present a few volunteers and Hussars in regimental dress. The M.C.’s were Bros. W. Hibbert and Devereux, and the refreshment stewards Bros. Cooper (Winwick), and Crompton (Ashton). The catering was in the hands of Bro. H. Hibbert, of the Blue Bell Hotel. The proceeds were for the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution, London.”

The annual tea and meeting connected with the Earlestown co-operative Society was held on Saturday, February 23td, 1884, in the Viaduct Institute, about 600 partaking. The meeting was presided over by Mr. J. W. Emmett, who was supported on the platform by Messrs. James Wrigley, Walter Vickers, John Thomason (Bolton), James Whitworth (Rochdale), B. Harrison, R. Brierley, John Bowes, William Pingstone, and William Bamford (Manchester), Robert Taylor (West Leigh), The Rev. H. Elwell Smith (Earlestown). Those engaged for the musical part of the programme were: Miss Kay, and Mr. McClure (Wigan), Mr. White and Mr. Banks (Earlestown). Mr. H. J. Durman officiated as accompianist. The Liverpool Alexander Hand-Bell Ringers were also engaged. The room was packed.

Mr. Haselden (secretary) presented the annual report, which stated that numbers had increased from 789 to 854 during the year, and the share capital from £6,917 to £7,335. Goods were sold to the value of £18,281. The total amount paid to members for interest on capital and dividend during the year was £2,485.
An interesting feature of the evening was a presentation of addresses to the treasurer, Mr. Joseph Holt, who had sustained the office for 14 years, and to Mr. Thomas Haselden, who had acted as secretary for 12 years, and who were both retiring from office. The addresses were signed on behalf of the society, by William Davies (president), Arthur Woffinden, William Gilmour, David Davies, John Lathom, George Makin, Joseph Hall, and J. A. Sugden (secretary).

A vote of thanks to the artistes and speakers was moved by Mr. R. Brierley, and Mr. B. Harrison, in seconding, introduced a subject which had been much discussed about that time in Earlestown, viz., the possibility of erecting a cotton factory in the town. It was, he said, well known that there was a large amount of surplus female labour in Earlestown, for which there was no market, and what a good thing it would be for fathers and mothers of girls in the place if they could send them to the factory instead of having to send them to a distance from here. If such a place were built, it would mean increased comfort to a great many of the homes in Earlestown, whilst the whole town would benefit generally. He hoped the audience would not think he was rude if he put the question to them, and asked those who were in favour of taking pound shares in such an affair to put up their hands. (In response a forest of hands was raised). It would not be a gigantic effort like the Ship Canal, for instance, but there were about 14,000 inhabitants in Earlestown, and if only a portion of them would take the matter up it would certainly go on.

A successful concert took place in the Infants’ Schoolroom, Market Street, Earlestown, on Monday night, February 25th, 1884. The place was uncomfortably packed, and many were unable to obtain admission. The artistes were to be children connected with the school, and the object of the concert the raising of funds for the purchases of prizes for attendance. Before the concert was concluded, the curate (the Rev. H. E. Smith) announced that the proceeds would be in the neighbourhood of £8, and spoke highly of the work which Mr. H. J. Durman, the organist of the church, had done in training the children.

Songs were sung by Miss Florence Laithwaite, Miss Sarah Marsh, Miss Kate Wildman, Miss Lizzie Clayton, Miss Annie Molyneux, Miss Kate Corlett, Miss Maggie Bailey, Miss Susannah Warburton, Miss Kate Glover, Miss Maggie Jones, Miss Ada Davies, Miss Nellie Lawrence, Miss Florence Mitchel, Miss Dora Aspinall, and Master Willie Jackson.

On Thursday evening, March 6th, 1884, a meeting was held in the Co-Operative Hall, Earlestown, to take feeling of local residents with regard to the prospective formation of a company for the purpose of erecting a cotton mill in the town. The room was crowded. Mr. P. Hall was elected to the chair, and was supported thereon by Messrs. Harrison, Davies and others.

The chairman expressed himself as ready to give such a scheme as was proposed all the moral and practical support that he could. He had no more money than a good many of those in front of him that night, but if they did all they could in Earlestown, and if the meeting secured the sympathy and support of the manufacturers and employers of labour at the outset, there was a possibility that even a large cotton factory in the district would become an accomplished fact.

Mr. B. Harrison in a short speech referred to the excellent returns which other towns were getting from their cotton mills and saw no reason why a combined spinning and weaving factory should not be a good proposition for the district.

Mr. Corlett said very few present could from experience in these matters, and he thought the best plan would be to propose a resolution to form a committee to get all the information they could and bring it to another meeting.

Mr William Gilmour endorsed what Mr. Corlett had said, expressing himself as being very much in favour of such a project.

Mr. B. Harrison then moved “That a provisional committee be appointed to formulate a scheme with reference to a factory, and when completed lay it before another meeting.”

Nr. W. Davies seconded, saying the question had been mooted for the last 28 years. The want of a cotton factory, or something of the sort, was much felt in the district.

Mr. Birkhead said there were girls running about, and lots of women, too, in Earlestown, who would be a great deal better off at work. He would support the thing to the best of his ability, only what they wanted to know was whether they were going to be asked to take £1 shares, or £100 shares. It would make all the difference.

Mr. William Davies then proposed “That this meeting is of the opinion that it is desirable to start a cotton mill in Earlestown.”

Mr. P. Critchley seconded.

The chairman put this to the meeting and it was carried unanimously.

The following committee was then appointed: The Chairman, Messrs. William Davies, E. T. Evans, John Davies, B. Corlett, M. Birkhead, William Gilmour, William Mills, Thomas Molyneux, B. Harrison, G. Ratcliffe, Thomas Ellison, William Rothwell, Thomas Haselden, H. Houghton, and P. Critchley.

It was resolved to hold another meeting the following Monday.

The Welsh annual festival of St. David’s Day was celebrated on Saturday, March 1st, 1884, in Earlestown Wesleyan School, about 300 persons sitting down to tea (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of March 8th, 1884), and a competitive meeting being held in the upper schoolroom under the presidency of P. M. Williams Esq., of Rhyl, in the evening.

The chief choral competition at the latter was won by the Tyldesley Choir, as was also the Congregational tune. “The Huntsman’s Chorus” was well sung by two parties and divided between Earlestown and Tyldesley. For the best sight-reading the successful competitor was Mr. P. Pierce, of Earlestown, who also won the prize for a five minutes’ speech on a subject given at the time.

The adjudicators were the Rev. J. H. Evans (Cynfaon), of Manchester, Mr. S. Nuttall, of Holywell, and Mr. P. M. Williams, Esq., of Rhyl.

On Friday evening last, stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of March 8th, 1884, a new billiard room, which had been erected at a cost of £180, in connection with the Conservative Club, was opened, the contract having been carried out by Mr. J. Pennington, builder. Mr. R. M. Westhead, president of the club, opened the room. Mr. J. Fairclough, of Warrington, and Mr. T. Stone, of Newton, opened the new table with a game of 300 up, Mr. Stone winning by 64. The room held two tables, one removed from the old billiard room, and one a new one supplied by Orme and Sons at a cost of 60 guineas.

On Saturday, March 1st, 1884, Earlestown met Everton in the District Cup Competition (having knocked Bootle, the holders, out in the previous round. At half time Everton led by three goals to nil, and in the end won by nine clear goals.
The teams were as follows: –

Earlestown: goal, T. Champion; backs, R. Green and F. Emmett; halves, J. Whalley, J. Green and R. Bowker; forwards, J. Cameron, J. Simm, J. Ellison and W. Rich.

Everton: goal, C. M. Lindsay; backs, R Morris and T. Marriott; halves, J. Preston, J. Pickering, and W. Henry; forwards M. Higgins, W. Gibson, J. McGill, D. H. Williams, and W. Richards.

[radman]

Here is April. (Sorry about the overly long delay between postings).

The monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners was held in Newton Town Hall on Monday, April 7th, 1884, Col. McCorquodale J.P. presiding. Also present Messrs. Pardey, Emmett, Gillespie, Forster, Fairclough, and Hunt, Mr. Worsley (Law Clerk) and Mr. Brierley (Surveyor).

The Highways Committee reported receipt of a letter from the Local Government Board enquiring what steps were being taken with regard to the sanitary condition of Wargrave, and its instructions to the Surveyor to reply that the sewering of Wargrave would commence shortly. It was ordered that the preliminary notices be served with a view to the commencement of the work.

Mr. Brierly submitted Mr. Balharry’s valuation of the tenants interest in the lands acquired for the Cemetery, amounting to £86/2/8, and after some discussion it was resolved that same be paid along with Mr. Balharry’s fee, £5/14/-.

It was resolved that the Surveyor proceed to fence off the Cemetery land with wood posts and wire fencing.

Plans for the erection of four cottages in Gas Street for Mr. J. Swann, eight houses in Wargrave New Road for the Earlestown Industrial Co-operative Society, two houses in Sankey Street for Mr. Gallaghan, two houses in Sankey Street for Mr. J. Eckersley, and intended street south-east of Wargrave Bridge for Mr. R. Houghton, were submitted and approved.

The Clerk reported that the agreement with the Board respecting the sale of land on behalf of the Newton Commissioners for Cemetery purposes had now been completed.

Another matter reported by the Clerk was that proceedings had been commenced against the County Authorities as duly authorised by the Commissioners.

At this stage of the proceedings it was stated that Mr. Lane had again attended and wished to be admitted to the Board Room respecting a rate which he (Mr. Lane) contended had been unjustly extorted from him.

The Clerk explained that Mr. Lane was in possession of a certain landing-stage at the time the rate was laid, and was therefore chargeable for it. To refund rates would be establishing a dangerous precedent. He did not think the money could be recovered.

Mr. Lane was then admitted and, addressing the chairman, said a policeman went to his house to distrain on his goods in lieu of a rate which he did not owe. He paid it under protest, so that his goods would not be taken away. He had two witnesses to prove that he was not in possession of a landing-stage when the rate was laid.

The chairman informed him that the Board was not prepared to entertain his application, and he must take his own course.

Mr. Lane, continuing, said he could get it back at the Court of Queen’s Bench.

The chairman, interrupting Mr. Lane, said they really could not go into the matter, he must take his own course.
Mr. Lane then left the room.

On Wednesday, April 20th, 1848, the annual Soiree in connection with the Viaduct Institute was held, the presentation of prizes won by students at the classes being followed by a grand ball, the whole proceedings lasting nearly 12 hours. The arrangements fell on the hands of the Institure Committee, Mr. Emmett, president; Mr. Harwood, vice-president; Messrs. Joseph Emmett, B. Harrisson, W. Crawford, R. King, W. Tarbuck, W. Hope, J. Jones, J. Mills, Mr. W. Ashton as secretary, and Mr. W. Banton, assistant secretary.

The decorations (stated the “Earlestown Guardian”) must have taken up some considerable time, as the large room was practically covered with flags, banners, drapery, flowers, bunting, mottoes, etc., the latter being very appropriate. At the end of the large room a supply of eatables had been prepared in a special ante-room for about 1,500 persons—no small matter of itself. Near to this was a refreshment bar for the after proceedings. At the other extreme end a platform was erected behind which hung the various works executed by the art students connected with the classes. The tea room proper occupied but one half of the large room, on one side of which a number of invited guests partook of tea. The room presented quite an animated appearance before tea commenced, these being about 1,500 bright and smiling faces ready and willing for action.

The tea was followed by a concert and distribution of prizes, and in the absence of Mr. Lawrence, one of the directors of the railway company, who was to have performed the distribution, the task was undertaken by the Rev. James Allatt.
Successful students were: James Appleton, Wilfred Austin, William Austin, James B. Barton, Mathew Barr, James Bedworth, James Blakemore, Henry Bunting, Thomas Cave, Thomas Clare, Richard Critchley, Wilfred Derbyshire, Fred H. Eaton, John Green, Charles Guinness, Ernest Harrison, Albert Houghton, William Jones, William Henry Lawson, Arthur Moors, Edwin Ogden, Robert Owen, Thomas Parr, John Pickup, James Powell, William Rothwell, Richard Schofield, John Smith, William Speakman, Arthur Statham, Thomas Sutton, Thomas Swift, William Henry Tence, Joseph Tunstall, James Walsh.

This part of the programme being concluded, the forms and division screens were cleared away and the band of the “B” Coy, 9th Lancashire Volunteers struck up with music for dancing, which was kept up until 5-30 in the morning.

Newton Lake (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of April 19th, 1884), came in for a large share of patronage during the holidays, particularly on Good Friday, when more people visited it probably, than have ever been known to do so in one day. The weather was beautifully fine, and throughout the day wagonettes, heavily laden, continued to pour into Newton from all the districts for miles around. Large numbers coming from Bolton, Wigan, Leigh, and St. Helens. The grounds surrounding the banks of the lake presented quite an animated appearance, and although somewhat difficult to estimate numbers under such circumstances, there could not have been less than 5,000 enjoying the pleasures of the vicinity. At the lake the demand for boats began about 11 in the morning and continued until dusk, and the eight boats available proved all too insufficient to accommodate those desirous of having a row. About the entrance to the lake were a large number of stalls upon which various commodities were offered for sale, and an inspection of the grounds on the following day provided ample proof of the fact that considerable business had been done by the stall-holders. Numbers of pleasure seekers had provided themselves with concertinas, fiddles, etc., and during the afternoon groups availed themselves of the music and danced together upon the green. Close by, a bowling handicap on the green connected with the Blue Bell Hotel, attracted considerable attention.

The attendance on Saturday was also large, but the cold weather of the succeeding days apparently had an adverse effect on the attendances, for there were not the same crowds present.

About 1,500 persons sat down to tea in the new works of Messrs. J. Slee and Co. engineers, near Earlestown Station, on Tuesday evening, April 15th, 1884, the occasion being the annual tea party in connection with the Household Stores, Earlestown. The gathering was almost solely confined to Mr. Molyneux’s own customers, who were invited free to the whole proceedings (tea party, concert and ball), two tickets being supplied to each. The programme at the concert was given mainly by the well-known entertainers “The Three Merrions.”

The seventh annual concert connected with St. Peter’s Singing Class, Newton, was held on Thursday evening, April 17th, 1884, under the conductorship of Mr. Joseph Owen, and accompanied by Miss A. Chicken. Mr McClure, of Wigan, was the principal artiste, others being the Misses Gloster A. Haynes, L. Naylor, A. Chicken, Percival A. Braddock, and A. Hewitt, Messrs. J. Owen and S. Swann. All the artistes were encored, and the concert, which was highly satisfactory, would compare favourably with any of its predecessors.

The annual tea and meeting connected with the Primitive Methodist Chapel, Earlestown, was held on Good Friday (1884). The Rev. F.M. Shimmin presided over the meeting, and referred in his remarks to the proposed new school, throwing out suggestions as to the augmenting of the Building Fund. The programme consisted mainly of readings and recitations, interspersed with singing by the choir. Readings were given by Messrs. J. Worsley, J. Taylor, and J. Woods, and recitations by J. Pendry, A. Arrowsmith, Austin, J.JH. Woods, and A. Morris (boys), and A. Worsley, R. Massey, E. Clark, and P. Hayes (girls).

The “Earlestown Guardian” of April 26th, 1884, contained a report of a case of importance to hawkers and traders in the Newton district. It was heard at the County Court, Warrington, before Mr. W.W. Ffoulkes. The plaintiff’s were the Newton in Makerfield Commissioners, and the defendant, James Carney, a salt hawker. Mr. T. Nash, barrister, instructed by Mr. Worsley, law clerk, appeared for the plaintiff’s.

Mr. Nash stated that the plaintiffs claimed 9d. as toll due to them as owners of the Newton in Makerfield Market. They also claimed damage in consequence of the defendant having refused to pay toll-they would leave the question of damages in his honour’s hands to do as he thought right. He thought he would be able to satisfy him that the question raised was one of vital importance to the whole community, who had laid out money for providing markets for the accommodation of the public. The point at issue was whether licensed hawkers, going into the market should be free from the liability of paying toll to the owners of the market, as well as being free and exempted by the 13th section of the Markets and Tolls Act from the penalties inflicted upon everybody except the licensed hawker who comes into a private market, as that of Newton in Makerfield was. He found that markets in this country had always been regarded in two aspects, and it had been the policy of the English law to encourage markets, partly for the public benefit, and partly for the private interest of the owners of the market. The English law always recognised distinction between the private interests of the owner of the market and the general interest of the public. The Act gave them power to provide a market and that it should be lawful to demand reasonable tolls. In Schedule B it stated for every one horse cart that toll should be 9d. In pursuance of the power by the Act of 1847, on the 31st August, 1870, certain land was leased to the commissioners for the purpose of fairs and market in the borough or township of Newton in Makerfield. A market was built and ready fro use in 1871, and two magistrates certified the market open. Everything was done perfectly regular, and the only point was one rising out of that section. James Carney went into the market once in September, and once in December, and a toll of 6d. was demanded on each occasion. There were several ways in which they might have raised that amount; they might have distrained on the cart, but the Commissioners thought that an oppressive way, and they had taken a most reasonable one of bringing him to court to test the right of the owners of the market and whether they could make the defendant pay toll.

The first witness was Mr. Worsley, law clerk to the Council, who produced a lease of the trustees of the Legh Estate, dated 1870, to the Commissioners, upon which the market is situate. He stated that John Crabtree was appointed market inspector and collector in 1879. Witness knew Newton in Makerfield very well. He knew the street where the defendant was stated to be hawking on the 18th December last. The street was within the limits of the township. The defendant, if hawking down Market Street or up Regent Street, was within the township of Newton in Makerfield. In the whole of his experience the whole of Newton in Makerfield had been a market by custom.

John Crabtree said he was market inspector. He had known the township for 22 years, and had formally been a policeman. In December he saw the defendant selling salt from a cart in Regent Street. That was part of Newton in Makerfield. He asked the defendant for a toll of 9d., but defendant said he would not pay—he had paid witness before but said he would not pay him any more. Since then a number of other hawkers had refused to pay. They had suffered damage to the extent of £5.

His Honour: It would take a good many ninepences to make up £5.

In answer to his honour witness said that every day was a market day.

His Honour: Are there people who stand in the market every day?

Witness: It is open every day but they don’t stand.

Defendant put in his licence, which he said was to hawk all over the country.

His Honour: So it is as far as it goes. You can hawk anywhere about the country without paying further toll and that licence justifies you in doing that. The question is—how you can act within the limits of a market, and claim to sell there whilst everybody else is paying toll.

His honour said the question was whether defendant was not further obliged to pay the toll. He was afraid he would have to give judgement against him; he could not see why the toll should not be paid by him.

Defendant: If I had not a licence I should have to pay.

His Honour: It seems to me that all your licence does is to exempt you from penalty if you are called before a magistrate to pay. The licence does not relieve you from paying to the owners of the market. You stand in the market by taking your horse and cart in.

Defendant said that he was selling salt but it was in the street.

His Honour: The whole of the township is a market, and the market is to be every day but Sunday.

His Honour said he must give judgement against plaintiff.

Mr. Nash (to defendant): Just give us the 9d.

Defendant said he would not give the tenth part of a farthing, because he had paid for hawking, and if he couldn’t hawk, the certificate for which he had paid was no use to him.

Local deaths recorded in the “Earlestown Guardian” of April 26th, 1884, included that of Mr. Goldsworthy, at his residence, Cross lane, Earlestown. Deceased had lived in the township about six years, and was connected with the Wesleyan Methodists, taking considerable interest in local church work.

On Sunday, April 20th, 1884, the annual school sermons were preached at the Newton Congregational Church. The collections, which were in aid of the school funds, realised £16/3/3.

The annual dinner in connection with the Newton Football Club took place in the Legh Arms Hotel, on Saturday, April 26th, 1884, when 50 members and friends attended. After the removal of the cloth, Mr. T. Fairclough, on behalf of the members, presented Mr. G. Lane, the captain, with a handsome walnut writing desk, in recognition of his energy on behalf of the club. Mr. Lane, in a few well-chosen words, thanked the members for their gift. The remainder of the evening was spent in a most enjoyable manner, several vocalists displaying their abilities.

The annual church parade of the “C” Troop, 4th Lancashire Hussars, and the “F” Coy., 19th Lancashire Rifles (Liverpool Press Guards), took place on Saturday (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of May 3rd, 1884) when there was a good muster of men, about 50 of the former and 70 of the latter being present. The band of the Hussars was present and played the combined “forces” to and from the church. The Rev. H. Monk (vicar) and the Rev. W. Johnson (curate) officiated.

The annual sermons on behalf of the Wargrave and Vulcan Sunday Schools were held on Sunday, April 27th, 1884, at the Wargrave Church. The morning preacher was the Rev. Canon Whitley, D.D., Vicar of Bedlington, and the evening preacher the Rev. J. Gallagher, of Everton. The collections for the day amounted to over £20.

At Warrington County Court on Saturday, April 26th, 1884, before Mr. W. Wynn Ffoulkes and a jury, a case finished after several hours hearing, in which Ann North, of 72, Church Street, St. Helens, won £20 damages in respect of a claim for illegal distraint made by her against John Lane, of St. John’s Terrace, Earlestown, and Edward Edwardson, of Cross Lane, Earlestown. It was claimed that defendants wrongfully entered plaintiff’s shop at 4, Bridge Street, Earlestown, and seized the stock-in-trade and other effects in distraint of rent.

Mr. H.L. Riley, appearing for plaintiff, contended that the distraint was illegal because by law it should have been made between sunrise and sunset, but that in this case the seizure was made between 8 and 9 o’clock at night.

His honour, in summing up, advised the jury that if they came to the conclusion that the distraint was after daylight, and therefore illegal they would have to determine what damages the plaintiff was entitled to.

The jury awarded £20 damages as stated.

[radman]

Here's May.

The annual church parade of the “C” Troop, 4th Lancashire Hussars, and the “F” Coy., 19th Lancashire Rifles (Liverpool Press Guards), took place on Saturday (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of May 3rd, 1884) when there was a good muster of men, about 50 of the former and 70 of the latter being present. The band of the Hussars was present and played the combined “forces” to and from the church. The Rev. H. Monk (vicar) and the Rev. W. Johnson (curate) officiated.

The regular monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners was held in Newton Town Hall on Monday, May 5th, 1884. Mr. Gooch presided, and there were also present—Messrs. J.C. Padey, James Fairclough, T. Stone, T. Hunt, B.B. Glover, T.J. Gillespie, T. Forster, J.W. Emmett, J.E. Worsley (law clerk) and R. Brierley (surveyor).

On Monday evening, May 19th, 1884, a large and enthusiastic meeting was held in the Golborne Congregational School, under the auspices of the Golborne and District Liberal Association, in support of the home and foreign policy of the Government. Mr. W. Mitchell, president of the Association, took the chair, and was supported by Mr. W.R. Kennedy, Barrister-at-law Liverpool, Mr. H.C. Powell, election agent, Liverpool, and Mr. R. Yates, Golborne. Subsequently Colonel McCorquodale entered the room and was greeted with loud applause.

Mr. W. Jackson moved the resolution of the evening which was “That this meeting expresses its sincere thanks to the Government for its determination to press forward the County Franchise Bill; and its confidence in the policy of the Government at home and abroad.”

On Tuesday evening, May 20th, 1884, a lecture was delivered in the Earlestown Co-operative Hall, under the auspices of the Earlestown Liberal Club, by the Rev. J.D. Alford, of the Financial Reform Association, his subject being “The foreign and financial policy of the Government.” The chair was taken by Mr. M. Birkhead, who was supported by Mr. Howard (secretary).
Votes of thanks at the close were proposed by Mr. J. Ball, and seconded by Mr. Howard.

The Newton Commissioners, in May, 1884, accepted the tender of Mr. W. Cunliffe, of Leigh, for draining and forming roads, paths. Etc., for the new cemetery, the contract amounting to £83/18/-; and of Mr. J. Rothwell, of St. Helens, for building the cemetery chapel, lodge boundary wall, etc., at the price of £2,387. The lowest local tender for the last mentioned contract, was submitted by Mr. Pennington, of Newton, whose quotation was £2,908.

The annual sermons in aid of the Earlestown Wesleyan Sunday School, were preached in the chapel on Sunday, May 10th, 1884, by the Rev. J.M. Fairbourn. Despite the fact that the resident minister was preaching instead of the stranger usually booked for such an occasion, the collections were the largest made since the chapel had been opened (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of May 17th, 1884).

In the afternoon, the cantata “The Choicest Gift” was given, special singers being Miss Swann, Mr. S. Swann, Mr. T. Gilmour, Miss Clara Roberts, Miss Sydes, Mr. Willis, Mr. Hastie, Mr. Gibson, Miss Walton and Mr. Jones. Mr. H. Barr conducted the singing, and Miss Greenall presided at the piano.

The school collections amounted to £13, and the total collections for the day to £52.

At the fortnightly meeting of the Board of Guardians, held at Warrington on Wednesday, May 28th, 1884, there was a long discussion on the question of expensive medicines in relation to cases of parochial relief. Mr. Greening (chairman) presided, and there were also present Messrs. Cooper, Roberts, Appleton, Blackhurst, B??nell, Brown Caldwell, Major Cartwright, Derbyshire, Gibson, Harrison, W. Houghton, J. Houghton, Jeaps, Jolley, Dr. Mackie, Owen, Siddall, Swinton and Worthington.

The minutes of the previous meeting having been disposed of, the Clerk (Mr. Sutton) said that in accordance with the Board’s instructions he had written to Dr. J.W. Watkins (Medical Officer of Health for the Newton district) pointing out that in the three districts of Messrs. Spinks, Joseph, and Sephton—containing a population of over 52,000, the total cost of expensive medicines for the year was £10/17/10, whereas in him (Dr. Watkins’) district, with a population of 18,198, the cost in the same period was £26/19/-, and stating that the Guardians desired to give him the opportunity of making any observations, explanatory or otherwise, of the great difference in this cost of expensive medicines. He also called the attention of the doctor to the matter of fees in midwifery cases, and drew his attention to the circumstances in which a medical officer was entitled to a fee; also to the fact that the fee approved by the Guardians was 10/6, and he asked for an explanation of his having charged—as was alleged—a higher fee in such cases.

The Clerk stated that in reply to this he had received a letter from Dr. Watkins, and the letter he then read.
In this, Dr. Watkins stated that he did not feel himself compelled to be governed or influenced by his colleagues’ medical treatment of their patients, and the question divided itself into two parts: had the medicines been administered improperly?; and had an excessive price been charged for them? Regarding the former, he frankly stated his opinion that the Guardians were not competent judges, and regarding the latter, he had to state that the medicines had been supplied in strict conformity with the regulations. A register had been kept and was being sent quarterly to the auditor of the Union accounts, and the prices charged were those recommended by dispensing chemist who had contracts to supply the Union. He trusted that none of the Guardians (save one) would discover “a flagrant and unjustifiable expenditure” in the sum of 10/- a week (less than the cost of the keep of one of his horses) for extra medicine to the sick poor in the population of over 18,000. Regarding the fees charged for obstetric cases, in the very few he had had they had all been abnormal, a large proportion necessitating long attendance, whilst many of the labours had been dangerous and severe. In conclusion, he suggested that if not satisfied, the Guardians should refer the matter to the Local Government Board, when “experts” could decide between him and them.

The Clerk said he had received another letter on the same subject, which read as follows;

Legh Street, Earlestown. May 20th, 1884.

I have read with considerable surprise the discussion that took place at the last meeting of the Guardians regarding expensive medicines administered by the Doctor of the Board, and the number of difficult labour cases. I know nothing about physic, but about labour cases I know a thing or two as well as the doctor. (Laughter). The impression conveyed in the report is a reflection upon the women of the Newton district, and unless contracted I shall consider it a downright libel. (Laughter). We know how to go about our work as well as any mothers in Lancashire, but no woman can deliver a child to order (laughter) and all we want is a little more time and less of the instruments (Laughter). Trusting to your sense of honour to have the matter put right, I remain, yours respectfully, Sarah Lowe.

P.S.—Does the Board think the smell from Sankey Brook has anything to do with it? (Laughter).

Mr. Appleton (after a long discussion) said he would make a recommendation at the next meeting to the effect that expensive medicines in the Newton district be supplied from the chemists.

The meeting then terminated.

On Saturday, May 31st, 1884, at the Newton Petty Sessions, before R. Houghton, J.P., (chairman) and T.J. Gillespie, Esq., 17 householders residing in Earlestown were summoned by the Warrington Board of Guardians for not having complied with the Vaccination Act.

Mr. J.C. Sutton (Clerk) stated that it would be worse than useless to attempt to conceal the fact that there is an organised determination to disobey the law, in the parish of Newton. The Guardians had tolerated that state of things for a time, but, finding that no improvement had taken place, they had determined to see that the law was carried out. Whether it was wise or unwise that the children should be vaccinated the legislature had, in its wisdom, determined upon vaccination. It was required that boards of Guardians should see that the law was carried out, and the Boards had no discretion in the matter. It appeared to him that the magistrates were without discretion except to hear the circumstances of the case, and if the facts were within the meaning of the Act, to inflict penalties or make orders for vaccination. It was quite clear that the Board would not appear before the magistrates on that occasion only, but cases would have to be brought before them at consecutive petty sessions until they had thoroughly purged out the opposition that prevailed with respect to vaccination in the parishes of Earlestown and Newton.

Mr. McWatt was then charged with refusing to have his child vaccinated and fined 20/- and costs.

Mr. Sam Stanley was also fined 20/- and costs.

Mr. John Clarke said he objected to vaccination on two grounds. First because it was no protection, and secondly because it was injurious to life and health.

The Chairman: That is only your opinion.

Defendant: It is adopted from 30 years’ experience and study. I could bring your worships proof of its injurious effects in Earlestown.

The Bench made an order that the child should be vaccinated within three weeks.

Mr. Joseph Emmett was next on the list and claimed he had not been served with the correct number of notices.

The Chairman: Do you refuse to have your child vaccinated?

Defendant: I decline to answer the question.

The Chairman: Then an order will be made that you have the child vaccinated in 21 days, or appear before the court.

Mr. A. McWatt was then charged under another section of the Act and an order for vaccination was made against him.

William Gilmour, when charged, said that he had suffered as a result of vaccination whilst his family was well and healthy without.

An order was made against the defendant, and also against James Barr, William W. Owen, James Grimshaw, John Lathom, and Richard Higgins.

Mr John Carlin was called up next, and appeared, amid much merriment, in his working clothes, with a face black from soot, and a chimney sweeping brush in his hand.

The Chairman: Are you prepared to have your children vaccinated?

Defendant: (promptly) I am. (Laughter).

The Chairman: Will you get this done in a fortnight?

Defendant: Most likely; anything for peace and quietness. (Laughter).

An order was made.

Mr. R. Parr (three cases) said he objected and an order was made in his case.

Mr. T.H. Hipwood said that since his last child was vaccinated it had never been well, and he objected to having another done.

Order granted.

Mr. Benjamin Harrison (three cases) and Mr. Alexander Foster (four cases) had orders made against them.

Charles Albert Owen was charged with neglecting to have his children vaccinated.

[Steven Dowd]

I think these are great Andrew. Noticed in this latest post that they were complaining that the Sankey River was stinking

Steven Dowd

[radman]

Yeah I think the Sankey was a real stinker for a long long time. I have a report of a public inquiry that was held when St. Helens wanted to increase the amount of effluent they released into it, not got round to transcribing it yet though.

[radman]

and June...

The monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners should have been held on Monday, June 1st, 1884, but there were not sufficient members present to form a quorum, and it was resolved to meet the next Monday.

The minutes showed that the Highways and Sanitary Committee had met during the month previous and that Dr. Watkins had attended to confer with the committee regarding the condition of Newton Brook.

Building plans were passed for four cottages in St. Helens Road for Mr. H. Roberts; three cottages in Oxford Street for Mr. Lambert; six cottages in Mercer Street for Mr. J. Greenall; eight cottages off St. Helens Road for Mr. R. Whitfield.

The annual distribution of prizes at the Sankey Sugar Works Sunday School took place on Sunday, June 1st, 1884, the Rev. Canon Whitley presenting the prizes and referring to the progress which had been made at the school under the indefatigable exertions of the superintendent, Mr. William Thompson. The school had been established seven years, and there were now 70 scholars and nine teachers.

The funeral of Mr. Dagnall, of Cross lane, Earlestown, took place at Wargrave Churchyard, on Saturday, June 7th, 1884, Mr. T. Vicars and a large number of employees of the firm attending. The service was conducted by the Rev. Canon Whitley.

The annual tea and meeting in connection with the Haydock Temperance Football Club was held in the Haydock Wesleyan Schoolroom on Saturday, June 7th, 1884. Mr. J. Jackson presided, supported by Messrs. C.H. Baxendale, J. Billinge, J. Fairhurst, Blackley (capt.), and G.H. Hunt (secretary).

The secretary, in his report, referred to the fact that the club was formed in 1879 by a few young men interested in total abstinence, to unite it with recreation and to enable each member to associate with fellow abstainers. The club had enjoyed an unbroken stream of prosperity in Lancashire Association Football, and had then 38 members. During the past season it had lost only three out of 15 matches.

During the evening a programme was rendered in which the following took part: Miss Wells (St. Helens), Mr. Myers, Mr. Baines, Mrs. Wedgewood, Mrs. Willis (Ashton), Miss Smith, Mr. J. Owen (Earlestown), Mr. Blackley.
Mr. Smith presided at the harmonium.

At Newton Town Hall, on Monday, June 9th, 1884, the adjourned monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners was held and there were present Messrs. Gooch (chairman), Fairclough, Stone, Glover, Hunt, Forster and Pardy.

The first sub-committee to deal with arrangements regarding the new cemetery was appointed, viz: Messrs. Gooch, Stone and Hunt.

At the fortnightly meeting of the Warrington Board of Guardians held on Wednesday, June 11th, 1884, the Clerk (Mr. J.C. Sutton) reported that in accordance with the instructions of the Board upwards of 20 persons had been summoned for non-vaccination. He (Mr. Sutton) had attended and supported the charges, and explained to the magistrates that the Board of Guardians simply desired to do its duty and comply with the requirements of the Local Government Board and that if the persons summoned would comply with the Vaccination Act they would hear nothing about the matter. If on the other hand they persistently refused to obey the law he had requested the magistrates to inflict the full penalty. He (the Clerk) met with considerable opposition on the part of the persons summoned. He now supposed the Board would desire summonses to be taken out under that Section whereby a penalty was to be inflicted.

Mr. Broadbent said he considered that when a person had been twice summoned he ought to be compelled to vaccinate.

The Clerk said they had no authority to do that. He required the Board’s authority to proceed further in the cases.
It was resolved “That the Clerk be instructed to proceed in the summonses for non-vaccination in the event of the law not being complied with.”

Mr. Caldwell: And you will have your proceedings set at defiance. You may prosecute as often as you please, but you will not do any good.

The new organ recently erected at newton Congregational Church by Messrs. Thorold and Smith, of Manchester, was opened on Sunday last (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of June 14th, 1884). The sermons were preached by the rev. J. Allattt (pastor). Mr. F.W. Blacow, organist of St. Clement’s, Manchester, presided at the organ throughout the day. The anthem “Sing a song of praise,” was sung by the choir in the morning, Miss Glover taking the solo parts. In the evening, Stainer’s anthem, “What are these?” was sung, with Miss Rothwell as soloist. The collections for the day (for the organ fund) amounted to £23.

On the following Wednesday evening, an organ recital was given by Mr. B. Kendrick Pyne, organist of Manchester Cathedral and Town Hall, and the collection taken carried the total of Sunday to over £50.

As in previous years, the past week has been generally observed locally as a holiday (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of June 21st, 1884), the principal works in the district having been closed for a portion, and some for the whole, of the week. The Sunday Schools have enjoyed their customary festivities, almost all of them having their processions and treats. The influx of people into Earlestown for the races was if anything in excess of previous years. From about nine o’clock on Tuesday morning special trains began to arrive, and people poured into the town from all directions. One who was not used to races would have been surprised at the number of respectable and distinguished looking men who proceeded in crowds along Market Street in a violent hurry, although the first race did not take place for some three hours. Such a profusion of light suits, kid gloves, heavy watch chains, and gold rings have never been seen in Earlestown—since the last Newton races.

The Earlestown Guardian of June 21st, 1884, recorded the death of Mr. Richard Walmsley, of the Legh Arms Hotel, Newton. Mr. Walmsley had formerly been an engineer at the Vulcan Foundry and Messrs. McCorquodale’s, subsequently becoming a licensee. He was a Roman Catholic, and the funeral took place at St. Oswald’s, Ashton. He represented Newton on the Board of Guardians.

At the annual meeting of Newton Building Society held in Newton Town Hall, June 18th, 1884, the report was presented by the secretary, Mr. Adams. The Chairman, Colonel McCorquodale, expressed his pleasure at the Society’s having done so well during the past year, and at the panic which had prevailed two years previously having passed away. He considered that with a little care it would continue to flourish.

Mr. Prescot, of Earlestown thought they were paying the secretary too big a salary and suggested a reduction from £90 to £60, moving that the managers consider a reduction.

This was carried.

The balance sheet was adopted, and the officers and managers appointed, Messrs. T. Mitchell, J. Crouchley, Bridge, and Sankey (in place of Messrs. W. Aitken, D. Barcroft, J.S. Entwistle, and J. Wrigley).

At Newton Petty Sessions, on Saturday, June 14th, 1884, Mr. J. Prescott, whose case was adjourned from the previous court on account of his absence from home, was charged with neglecting to vaccinate his child.

The presiding magistrate said he could not deal with the case as the summons was issued by Mr. Gillespie.

The Clerk said they could dismiss the case if the defendant did not still object.

The defendant said he did object.

The summons was withdrawn for another to be issued

The repairs which are being executed at St. Peter’s Church, Newton (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of Saturday, June 28th 1884), are making satisfactory progress. The old tower has been pulled down and the new one is now in course of erection, and is already half completed. After this has been accomplished the interior of the church will be thoroughly renovated, which last is undoubtedly a work of necessity, as the last occasion upon which it underwent renovation was in 1857. It has been asserted by some of the villagers that the church tower did not require rebuilding, and they have pointed as evidence of the fact to the difficulty which the workmen experienced in pulling down the old tower. But if the nature of the stone of which the structure is built is taken into consideration it will easily be understood how the fears of those who apprehended the falling of the tower were excited. The stone does not appear to be very durable, being, in fact, red sandstone, of the softest kind, if we may judge from the manner in which the rain has worn away certain portions of it. This weather-beaten and antiquated appearance is apt to make the stranger imagine that the church is far more ancient than it is, and that it has stood for at least four or five centuries. As a matter of fact it is only about 50 years old, as it was rebuilt in 1834. The ancient church, or rather chapel, as it is termed below, was erected in 1683 and was a branch of the mother church at St. Oswald’s, Winwick. It was, therefore, built in the time of the merry King Charles, and in the year when the leaders of the “Protestant Conspiracy” which sought to wrest the crown from Charles and secure it for the Duke of Monmouth, were executed. At that time, too, newton enjoyed the enviable privilege—especially enviable in these days when “redistribution” is looming on the horizon—of returning two members to parliament, a privilege which it possessed from the first year of Queen Elizabeth’s reign, 1588, to the passing of the Reform Bill in 1832, when it was disenfranchised. At that time also, Newton was the head of the Barony. In the present church there is hung at the west end of the building a board on which is inscribed information which is both interesting and suggestive—both to ye ancient inhabitants of St. Peter’s and to outsiders. The letters are not very legible, being almost defaced, apparently by the lapse of time, but the following is a copy of the inscription: “Benefactors to the chapel and school of Newton. Edward sixth, King of England, gave a pension out of the Duchy rent of £3/1/7; Richard Blackburn, of Newton, gentleman, 1612, gave by will, £20 out of his land, since compounded by his heir for £300. Richard Legh, Esq., Baron of Newton, built this chapel at his own charge, 1683. Richard Legh, Esq., Baron of Newton, and the Charterers gave land enclosed from the common to the use of the chapel for ever, A.D. 1684. Thomas Eaton gave, 1693, £5. Peter Sorrocold, gentleman, gave, 1608, £5. Thomas Frith gave, 1703, £5. John Stirrup built a schoolhouse at the Deane upon his own charge, and gave the use of £50 for ever, June 6th, 1677.” At the other side is a list of persons who have given donations to the poor of the parish, beginning with Richard Sorrocold, who, in 1638, gave £6, and ending with the date 1730. As will be seen above, the ancient schools were erected in 1677, the present commodious schools being quite modern, as they were built in 1859. The present church consists of chancel, nave, porch, and a small tower containing one bell over the western entrance. Extending our survey into the churchyard, we find that the most ancient gravestone is dated 1749, being that of Sarah, daughter of John and Margaret Allanson. The next to it is dated 1750, and is that of an infant child. The majority of the old gravestones however, are almost crumbled away, being composed of the same kind of stone as the church, a stone which is exceedingly ill-adapted for such a structure.

The work in connection with the laying-out of the new cemetery (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of June 28th, 1884) appears to be progressing satisfactorily. The contract for laying-out and draining the ground has been let to Messrs. Cunliffe, Leigh, whilst the building contract has been given to Messrs. Rothwell, St. Helens. The work of draining is being proceeded with and several of the walks are partly laid out. The mortuary is in the course of erection and the walls are about half completed. There will only be one gate-house, on the side nearest Moss Lane, and the foundations have already been laid. When the cemetery is completed, and judging from the progress which has already been made, it will no doubt be finished in a few months, funerals will proceed to it by way of Moss Lane, as the entrance will be made from the roadway.

On Saturday June 29th, 1884 at the Newton Petty Sessions, before Messrs. R. Houghton (chairman), T.J. Gillespie and J. Pearson, another anti-vaccination case was called, which attracted a lot of attention. Daniel Garnett, of Earlestown, was the defendant, and he was summoned for failing to have a child vaccinated. The case was one out of four which were down for hearing at the Court. Mr. Thomas Duxbury, of Blackburn, answered the call, and said that he represented the defendant, Garnett.

The Clerk: In what way? Are you a solicitor?

Mr. Duxbury: No, but I have written instructions to appear on his behalf.

In reply to the charge, he pleaded “not guilty,” and contended that the summons was illegal in that it was issued under Section 29 of the Act, and under that section the magistrates had no power to order the attendance of the child which the summons in this case had done.

The Clerk said he considered the summons was in order, there was no reference to the Section under which it was issued, and the magistrates must take it under the 31st.

Mr. Duxbury pointed out that the summons quoted the whole of the 29th Section, and if taken out under that was illegal. He pressed for an understanding as to which they were dealing with.

The Clerk said that the Vaccination Officer had stated that it was under Section 29.

Mr. Duxbury: Then the summons is irregular.

The Chairman: What object can you gain by having these cases delayed?

Mr. Duxbury: It enables the parent to have another opportunity if he wants to have his child vaccinated.

The Vaccination Officer (Mr. Cooper) in response to Mr. Duxbury’s request, handed him the notice served on the defendant.

Mr. Duxbury pointed out that this had not got a proper date on—not having the year on it—and it did not contain the Vaccination Officer’s address, which the law stated he must give.

The Clerk: It has the place of vaccination on.

Mr. Duxbury (to the Bench): Am I to understand that this case is dismissed?

The Chairman: yes.

Mr. Duxbury: In that case all the notices are similar, except a few, which may be a bit worse (laughter).

The Chairman: Are all these notices alike?

Mr. Cooper: Yes, all in one form.

The Chairman: It is very irregular on your part to have them so.

The Clerk said a blank was left the notice for the Vaccination Officer to fill in the date.

Mr. Cooper: Which I did.

The Chairman: No, no.

The Clerk (to the Vaccination Officer): You are bound to give them a certain notice containing positive and definite information as to time and place.

Mr. Duxbury: And the notice must contain the officer’s name and address.

Mr. Cooper: Then are these cases adjourned?

Mr. Duxbury (to the bench): Not adjourned, your worships. You have not the power to adjourn them.

The Chairman: They are dismissed.

On Saturday, June 29th, 1884, an interesting bowling match between 12 hand-picked men representing Newton Glass Bottle Makers, and 12 representing that industry in St. Helens, took place on the Oak Tree bowling green, Newton. Eleven out of the twelve Newton men won, and the total was 125 to 174 at the finish. The names of the Newton side were Joseph Rylance, John Docherty, Hugh McKernan, Peter Wilson, Thomas Broughton, John G. Wolfe, William Cheesbrough, David Bromilow, Robert Brown, Duncan McGilvray, William Donaldson, and Alexander Buchan. The bowlers subsequently partook of an excellent dinner at the expense of the defeated team, the catering being carried out by the landlord, Mr. Gorse. Mr. J. Rylance presided, and during the evening presented a handsome medal to Mr. D. McGilvray, who had been mainly instrumental in raising the Newton team.

Local Cricket in ’84.

Earlestown St. John’s v. Warrington Grammar School.

St. John’s.

J. Hyde, b Tuckey 0
J. Jones, b Tuckey 0
G. Makin, b Thompson 20
J. Roughley, c Thompson b Tuckey 0
C.H. Lea, b Tuckey 0
H. Rich, b Tuckey 2
H. Tarbuck, run out 3
W. Welsh, b Thompson 4
P. Bailey, b Tuckey 6
C. Lindsay, not out 5
J. Gray, c Voisey b Bolton 7
Extras 14
Total 36

Grammar School.

J. Bradie, b Makin 6
L. Voisey, b Welsh 13
S. Tuckey, run out 2
J. Hollowel, lbw b Welsh 0
W. Bolton, b Welsh 6
J. Haynes, b Makin 1
J. Thompson, run out 12
R. Carson, b Makin 22
A. Rose, c bailey b Makin 8
H. Thompson, st Roughley b Makin 1
J. Reynolds, not out 7
Extras 6
Total 84

[maggie]

Thank you Radman very enjoyable reading ,I look forward to more .

[radman]

and July...

At a monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners, held in the Town Hall on Monday, July 7th, 1884, Mr. Gooch presided, and there were also present Messrs. Forster, Glover, Hunt, Fairclough, Emmett, Pardey, Dr. Watkins, Worsley (Law Clerk), and Mr. Brierley (Surveyor).

The Surveyor read a letter which he had received from Mr. Pardey with reference to the alleged encroachment on Newton Common, stating that he (Mr. Pardey) must call attention to his previous letter with respect to the subject, the letter not only remaining unanswered, but being apparently ignored and treated with contempt. Instructions, he said had been given as to carting soil and filling up water pits, which constituted a defiant act of trespass on the part of the Commissioners on Mr. Legh’s land.—Another letter from Mr. Pardey to the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Gooch, was also read, affirming that Mr. Brierley’s systematic and defiant act of trespass on Mr. Legh’s estate gave him no alternative but to hold the Commissioners liable for the damage sustained.

The following letter from Mr. Brierley was read:—“Newton-le-Willows, July 7th, 1884. To the Chairman and members of the Newton Board of Commissioners. Gentlemen. It will be observed from the minutes of the Highways Committee that Mr. Legh’s agent (Mr. Pardey) has, in a letter of the 3rd ult., alleged certain trespasses and damage at Newton Common, caused by the road improvement. Such letter being set out as a formal notice of claim has subsequently been followed by other intimidations, and stoppage, by force, of our workmen in the execution of their duty. I may briefly remark that the statements in Mr. Pardey’s letter are incorrect. In the first place, the road is only of the same width as formerly, the fence alluded to on the north side of the road is one of the numerous enclosures of common, which was made by Mr. Legh’s agent about 15 months ago, a great portion of which was shortly afterwards levelled down, and has only been refixed within the last two or three weeks. Apart from the question of the rights of common enclosure, a duty which the “Common Lookers,” or the Commissioners, in the interests of the public, ought to suppress, the fence in question for the whole length of the Common has been fixed within 18 to 20 feet from the centre of the road. Section 118 3rd George IV., chap. 126, sets out that “no fence or enclosure on any common or waste land shall be erected within 30 feet from the centre of the turnpike road” and as the road in question is part of the Bolton and St. Helens turnpike, I must advise the Commissioners to take the opinion of the Law Clerk upon the subject and act accordingly.—R. Brierley, Surveyor.

The Law Clerk corroborated Mr. Brierley’s statement, and read the Act upon the subject.

The Chairman said that their Law Clerk had informed them that no trespass had been committed. It would be well for a deputation to inspect the land.

Mr. Pardey declined to meet the deputation.

The Chairman said it seemed to be a matter of courtesy, but, of course, if Mr. Pardey would not meet the deputation it would be almost a waste of time for them to attend.

Ultimately, on the motion of Mr. Glover, Messrs. Fairclough and Stone were appointed to inspect the land, together with the Law Clerk, and the discussion then terminated.

The surveyor reported that the case of the Newton Commissioners v the Justices of the Peace for the County of Lancaster respecting the maintenance of highways, was before the Queen’s Bench on the 10th, and on the 12th a decision was given by the judges entirely in the favour of the Newton Commissioners. Mr. Hulton, Clerk of the Peace, had stated that the result would be most disastrous to the County authorities, and expressed his intention of appealing, but from what he (Mr. Brierley) had since heard, he did not think any appeal would be made.

The ceremony of the laying of the foundation stones of the new Primitive Methodist Sunday School premises in Lord Street, Earlestown, took place on Saturday, July 5th, 1884. The chapel was erected in 1873, the school being considered inadequate to accommodate the 200 scholars attending—and as it consisted of rooms in two cottages, considerable inconvenience was encountered in carrying it on. Land for new schools had therefore been obtained from Mr. Legh, and with messrs. Maxwell, Tuke and Hurst as architects, the work of building was to be carried out by Mr. Joseph Pennington. The total cost, including heating and lighting, was to be over £800. Previous to laying the stones, a procession headed by a large banner proceeded round the streets headed by Mr. Clarke (treasurer), Mr. Woods (superintendent), Lowton Temperance Band, Revs. J.M. Fairbourn, F.N. Shimmin, T. Cobb and D.S. Prosser, Messrs. Thornly and Glover, and then the scholars followed after.

The first stone was laid by Mr. Woods, and others by Mr. Glover, of Warrington, Mr. Thornton,of Warrington (who gave a donation of £30).

Several bricks were also laid on which sums ranging from 2/6 to £5 were placed.

After the ceremony a tea meeting was held in the Viaduct Institute at which upwards of 400 people were present and following the tea there was a meeting in the Legh Street chapel. Mr. S. Davies, Manchester, presided, supported by the Revs. W.C. Tayler, T. Cobb and F. Shimmin.

The amount taken during the day realised over £164.

On Saturday, July 12th, 1884, at the Newton Petty Sessions, before Col. McCorquodale (chairman), Messrs. R. Houghton, C. Pilkington and A. McCorquodale, six residents of Earlestown were charged with neglecting to vaccinate their children.

The first case called was Mr. Richard Higgins.

Mr. Sutton said the defendant had been served with a notice ordering him to have his child vaccinated, and his only defence could be production of the certificate of vaccination or proof as to the unfitness of the child.

Mr. Duxbury, who again appeared to represent the defendants, claimed the right to address the Bench for a mitigation of the penalty.

The magistrates’ clerk said the magistrates had no discretionary power.

Mr. Duxbury said he must refer the Clerk to the 31st section of the Act.

Addressing the Bench, Mr. Duxbury said he claimed that it was unusual for the Clerk to rule publicly. In most cases he was not supposed, and in most courts, indeed, did not, give any public utterances.

The Clerk (sarcastically) addressing Mr. Duxbury: You are undoubtedly a good temperance hotel keeper, but you cannot rule the magistrates out of order.

Mr. Duxbury was about to quote the Act in reference to the penalties, when the chairman said that the Bench could not go into the Act. The Bench had decided that if the defendant would undertake within a reasonable time to have his child vaccinated, the case would be adjourned.

Mr. Duxbury said that for such leniency and privilege he must thank the Bench—it spoke largely for the Bench—but as the case affected more than one parent he was not prepared to give the undertaking required, but would ask for the smallest penalty.

Mr. Sutton said that in London and Liverpool small-pox prevailed largely, and the Guardians felt that they must put down the obstinacy that prevailed at Earlestown, and which happily, was now confined to a few. They had only six cases that day for disobedience to the orders previously made. They had desired in the first instance to act in a spirit of conciliation, and offered to pay all costs incurred if the defendants would consent to vaccination. At first he did not ask for costs but he would do so now after all the trouble caused by the determined obstinacy of half a dozen—if they did not comply with the law.

The chairman said the Bench was glad that such leniency had been shown. People had conscientious objections, and it was a matter of great responsibility for the magistrates could not hear of the Act being overridden. They had to take the law as it stood, whether agreeable or not, and they had decided to inflict the full penalty of 20/- and costs.

The next case was that of Mr. Benjamin Harrison.

The chairman said the Bench would allow time for the law to be complied with, if an undertaking to vaccinate was given.

Mr. Duxbury said he could not give any such undertaking in any of the cases.

Fined 20/- and costs.

Mr. William Gilman was next charged and fined 20/-, as also were Mr. Alexander Foster and Mr. John Clarke.

A Charge against Mr. Joseph Emmett was, on technical grounds adjourned to the next court.

On Monday evening, July 14th, 1884, a large and enthusiastic meeting was held in the Market Place, Earlestown for the purpose of protesting against the action of the House of Lords in rejecting the Franchise Bill. Upwards of 1,000 working men were present. Mr. W. Walton presided. The resolution of protest was moved by Mr. George Clarke, seconded by Mr. William Davies, and supported by Mr. David Williams.

A motion in favour of the reconstruction of the House of Lords was moved by Mr. John Prescott, seconded by Mr. Pearson, and supported by Mr. Luffman.

On Saturday, July 12th, 1884, the annual excursion in connection with Messrs. Evans’ Collieries took place, Blackpool again being the place selected. Three trains carrying about 2,000 of the workmen and their families left Earlestown about 6 a.m. The trains arrived home about 11 p.m., all arrangements for the day having passed off without a hitch.

At the annual meeting of the Newton Commissioners, held in Newton Town Hall on Wednesday, July 23rd, 1884, there were present Messrs. Gooch (Chairman of the Board), Hunt, Stone, Fairclough, Emmett, Brierley (Surveyor), Worsley (Law Clerk), and several ratepayers.

The Chairman said he had to announce that Messrs. Stone, Hunt, and Fairclough had been duly re-elected without opposition, they being the only gentlemen nominated for the vacancies on the Board.

Mr. Ratcliffe (a ratepayer) said that he had been over the accounts and would like to know whether the Board received any renumeration for the maintenance of the roads. Other Local Boards had, he knew, received some for keeping the roads in repair (from the county authorities) and as there were a great many roads in the local district, and they often needed repairing, he considered some steps ought to be taken to obtain something towards their upkeep.

The Law Clerk said that the Commissioners, at the passing of the Highways and Locomotives Amendment Act, which allowed a local authority half the cost of the maintenance of the roads in its district, applied to the county authorities at once. The county refused to grant the application, and various deputations had been sent to wait upon them, until, at last, acting under counsel’s advice, the Commissioners instituted proceedings in the Court of the Queen’s Bench to recover what they had claimed. The case was heard in the early part of the year and a decision given in favour of the Commissioners, and they now recover from the Authority what they were entitled to under the Act. The county authority had, however, given notice of appeal against the decision.

Mr. Ratcliffe also asked for particulars as to what the Cemetery Rate was likely to be. The rates in the district were already sufficiently high and it would make them very high if this rate was to be 8d or a 1/- in the £.

The Chairman: It will not amount to that.

Mr. Ratcliffe said that another thing which burdened the local property owner was the expensive form of street-making adopted by the Commissioners. Some of the streets which had been made would last over a thousand years, and there were some streets in Earlestown over which a cart never went, unless it was a night cart.

The Chairman said that the fact that all the streets were so well made was all to the advantage of the ratepayers as they would not cost so much for repairing.

Mr. Ratcliffe contended that it tended to the disadvantage of the property owners as it was too expensive a process and made the rates heavy.

The Chairman at the close regretted the small attendance in view of the fact that the Commissioners had in front of them the large Wargrave sewerage scheme which had been forced upon them and which could only by carried through at considerable expense.

Mr. Ratcliffe said he could only account for the small attendance of ratepayers by the fact that Newton was such an out of the way place. The Town Hall was almost built there by fraud. (Laughter).

At a special meeting of the Newton Commissioners, held on Monday afternoon, July 21st, 1884, it was resolved to purchase land at Wargrave from Mr. Legh for the new sewerage works.

Regarding the alleged encroachment on Newton Common, Mr. Brierley read the minutes of a special committee meeting at which it was recommended that the Law Clerk be instructed to write to Mr. Legh’s agent, demanding a removal of the posts and wire fences on the north side of the road.

The Chairman said that the opinion of the committee was that the Commissioners had not at all exceeded their rights in the action they had taken, that they had not encroached, and that they had a right by Act of Parliament to make a road without question, and that the fence which had been erected was an encroachment under the Act. It was a question with the committee as to whether it was right to have a fence at all on common land.

Mr. Stone proposed that the Law Clerk inspect the road, and if it was then considered advisable that he should write to Mr. Pardey, requesting him to take down the fence on the north side of the road on Newton Common, as the fence was an encroachment on the road.

Mr. Emmett seconded and it was agreed to.

On Saturday, July 26th, 1884, the Liverpool employees in the Goods Department of the L. & N. W. Railway Company held their 20th annual festival. The sports were held in Castle Hill Field, Newton-le-Willows, kindly lent for the occasion by Col. McCorquodale. The weather was unfavourable, rain pouring down continuously throughout the proceedings.

There were about a thousand spectators present. After the sports the company divided, one section going to the Pied Bull Hotel, where tea was provided by Mr. Bond, and another to the “Legh Arms,” where they were catered for by Mr. Walmsley. After tea the Town Hall was resorted to and the evening spent in dancing, etc.

The 15th annual meeting of the Viaduct Institute Committee was held on Tuesday evening, July 29th, 1884, in the Institute, Mr. J.W. Emmett presiding.

Mr. C. Ashton, secretary, read the report for the year, which showed that the library contained 2,755 books, and that during the year there had been 6,329 issues to 228 readers. The bowling green had again been well supported during the year, the takings being £2 in excess of the previous year. One of the greens had been temporarily set aside for lawn tennis until a piece of ground in the field was ready to play upon.

The report of the Science and Art Class secretary showed that the results of the last examination had not been as good as had been anticipated. One pupil had taken certificate of excellence for art, and another obtained a special prize of merit for art work sent up to South Kensington for examination.

Messrs. Barr, Massey, Emmett, Grimshaw, Sherwin, and Blair were elected to serve on the committee in the room of those retiring. Messrs. Sephton and Chandley were re-elected auditors.

On Wednesday evening, July 30th, 1884, a concert was given in the Co-Operative Hall, Earlestown, in aid of the funds of the Welsh Congregational Chapel. The chapel, which was situated in Houghton Street, was erected in 1866, at a cost of something over £350. Towards this amount, Messrs. Evans generously contributed £50, and with this sum to serve as a nucleus, a small but courageous band of workers, numbering scarcely two dozen, took possession of the chapel, which was capable of seating 120 persons. Nothing daunted by the smallness of their numbers, the congregation attempted, by means of entertainments and collections, to raise sufficient money to clear off the debt of over £300 with which they were confronted, and at the date of the concert now being referred to this had been reduced to £40. Considerable credit was due to the secretary, Mr. R.O. Roberts, and also to Mr. T.O. Roberts, who had both worked hard in order to free the chapel from debt, and who were responsible for the arrangements for this concert, by which it was hoped that £20 would be raised. The attendance however, was only moderate, the Co-operative Hall being about half filled.

Newton Congregational Church appointed Mr. Alfred Caldwell as their organist at a salary of £10 per annum.

The anniversary services in connection with the Earlestown Primitive Methodist Sunday School were observed on Sunday, July 27th, 1884, the preacher being the Rev. T. Whittaker of Leeds. In the afternoon a service of song entitled “Messiah” was rendered by the choir, with Mr. Banton as conductor. The Rev. F.N. Shimmin (pastor) officiated as reader, and Mr. W. Austin presided at the harmonium. The collections realised £17/2/-.

The vaccination case reported again Mr. Joseph Emmett, of Earlestown, which had been adjourned from the previous Court was again brought up at Newton on Saturday, July 26th, 1884.

The Vaccination Officer (Mr. Cooper) stated that the child had now been vaccinated.

The Bench ordered that the costs (11/6) be paid by the defendant as he had not complied with the order in the first instance.

[Steven Dowd]

Hi Andrew,

I wonder if the metal detectorist's here have noticed the section about the event on Castle Hill fields above, over 1000 people in the rain all day, I would imagine quite a few coins and bits got accidentally pulled out of pockets with wet hands and lost.

Thanks for the additions loads of interesting bits in these old reports

Steven Dowd

[davros]

Here are some pictures to go with the article.

The foundation stones are still there to this day.

DSCF0464.JPG

DSCF0466.JPG

DSCF0465.JPG

It's a very interesting article , keep 'em coming Andrew.
It's good reading what was going on all that time ago.

Dave

[radman]

Glad you're liking them, there'll be a few more over Christmas

and yes I should imagine anything that fell on the floor would have been almost instantaneously buried if it was raining all day, just one muddy boot to ensure it was lost completely.

[radman]

Merry Christmas everyone. Here's August....

At the annual meeting of the Newton Commissioners, held on Monday evening, August 4th, 1884, there were present Messrs. W.F. Gooch, J.E. Pardey, J. Fairclough, T. Hunt, T.J. Gillespie, J.W. Emmett, B.B. Glover, T. Forster, J.E. Worsley (Law Clerk), and R. Brierley (Surveyor).

On the proposition of Mr. Emmett, seconded by Mr. Gillespie, Mr. Gooch was re-elected as chairman of the Board for the coming year.

The minutes of the Highways and Sanitary Committee, which had met a fortnight previously, showed that letters had been received from the London and North-Western Railway Company respecting the discharge of sewage into the canal west of Earlestown. Messrs. Gooch, Fairclough and the Surveyor were, deputed to call upon Mr. Worthington respecting the arrangements made by him and the committee to carry the sewage under the canal into tanks to be built on the company’s land between the canal and the brook.

The committee recommended that the Law Clerk be instructed to write to Mr. Legh’s agent calling upon him to remove the post and wire fence on the north side of Newton Common Road, it being an encroachment upon the public road as advised by the Law Clerk.

The committee also recommended that the roads and paths in the cemetery by ashphalted instead of macadamised. The extra cost was estimated at about £65.

The minutes of the special meeting called to consider the sewage question having been read, Mr. Worsley reported that he was instructed to suggest to Mr. Pardey that the matter be left in the hands of Mr. Vauser, he had done so, and Mr. Pardey had since written to say that he could not consent to that, and he (Mr. Pardey) suggested other gentlemen.

Mr. Glover moved “that a committee comprising the chairmen of different committees see Mr. Pardey to arrange with him as to the price of the land required for the sewerage works, and following the arrangement that the committee agree to Mr. Vauser as their valuer, leaving Mr. Pardey to appoint anyone he may think fit, to represent him.”

Mr. Emmett seconded the motion, which was carried.

Mr. Worsley stated that in accordance with the decision come to at the special meeting of the Board, he had written to Mr. Pardey requesting him to remove the fence at the Common. He had received several letters on the matter from Mr. Pardey,—in the last one he wrote that he would be quite willing to meet the Surveyor, Law Clerk and Chairman on the matter, although their views did not agree with his.

Mr. Glover said that as Mr. Pardey had expressed his willingness to meet the Commissioners he begged to propose “that the gentlemen mentioned meet Mr. Pardey in order to come to some arrangement respecting the encroachment on Newton Common Road.”

Mr. Emmett seconded the motion, which was agreed to.

The Chairman said that he and the Surveyor met Mr. Worthington in accordance with the instructions of the Sanitary Committee, and had a long discussion on the matter during which, Mr. Brierley produced plans showing arrangements for carrying the sewage in the brook on to the west side of the canal, and there dealing with it in tanks, which he (the Chairman) thought was a large and expensive scheme for so small a matter. Mr. Worthington suggested that they should put a small tank on that side of the canal and save a great deal of expense and then sufficiently treat and clarify the water as to permit it running into the canal, which there would then be no objection to. He (the Chairman) thought something must be done as the railway company seemed disposed to press the matter and to give every help to and facilitate any plan the board might adopt. The plan Mr. Worthington had mentioned would be cheaper than taking it under the canal.

Mr. Glover said that if Mr. Worthington’s plan was carried out they would have to erect a tank on Mr. Pardey’s land, and he therefore proposed that the committee appointed to meet the latter on the other question should also confer with him as to the site for a tank. This was agreed to.

The Chairman said that he had received letters from Col. McCorquodale desiring to resign his position as a member of the board. The first letter was as follows:

“Gladlys,” Menai Bridge, Anglesey, July 22nd, 1848. Dear Sir,—I regret that I cannot be with you at your annual meeting tomorrow. Seeing that my attendances have been very irregular of late it does not appear fair to the ratepayers that I should continue to be a Commissioner. I shall, therefore, be glad if you will place my resignation before the meeting and assure the ratepayers and commissioners that I shall still feel very grateful for the kind indulgence which has been shown to me during the existence of the Board, for I have been one of its members from the time of the Acts coming into force. I can well remember Newton without gas, and, except from springs, without water. It is very satisfactory to know that the Newton district is now one of the healthiest in your county. I remain yours faithfully, George McCorquodale.

The Chairman said that he wrote to Col. McCorquodale, expressing a hope that he would not persist in the expressed intention, and in reply to that he had received a second letter, as follows:

August 2nd, 1884. Dear Mr. Gooch—It is very kind of your hesitation to put forward my letter, I felt that by not attending the meetings of the Commissioners more regularly I was standing in the way of another who might serve the interests of the ratepayers more effectively. I leave the decision entirely in the hands of the Commissioners, and remain, faithfully yours, George McCorquodale.

Mr. Gillespie moved that the resignation be not accepted. They would lose a very competent man if they were to lose Col. McCorquodale, and it was for the interests of the ratepayers that he should be retained.

Mr. Glover seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously.

The quarterly meeting of the Earlestown Industrial Co-Operative Society was held in the Co-Operative Hall on Monday evening, August 4th, 1884, Mr. William Davies presiding. The balance sheet showed that the receipts for the quarter were £4,137 3s 4d, on which there was a net profit of £540 19s 5½d. From this a dividend of 2/6 in the £ was declared. Messrs. J. Jones and J. Moss were elected to serve on the committee of management. It was decided to take up shares to the extent of £100 in Rochdale Corn Mill.

On Saturday, August 16th, 1884, Earlestown was the scene of a great Liberal demonstration, which (according to the “Earlestown Guardian” of the following week), was attended by some 15,000 people. The demonstration was organised by the South-West Lancashire Liberal Association, and Liberals from all over South-West Lancashire poured into the Division. The various contingents met in front of the Liberal Club, in Fairclough Street, Earlestown, and formed into a procession, in which were several bands, and marched through Bridge Street, headed by a wagonette containing Mr. Pilkington, Mr. Arch, Mr. E. Edwards, Mr. T. Howard (secretary of the Earlestown club) and several members of the committee. Special trains from various towns brought crowds in throughout the afternoon. The demonstration took place at the junction of Crow Lane and Market Street, where three platforms were erected.

On No. 1 platform were Messrs. T. Brockleband (chairman of the South-West Lancashire Liberal Asssociation), S. Smith, M.P., Alderman Boothroyd, W. Guyler, J. Roberts, T. Harrop, E. Paull, W.S. Robson (London), G.W. Rawlins, S.K. Muspratt, G.E. Burgess, Edward Jones B.A., and others; the resolution being proposed by Mr. Charles Pilkington, J.P., and seconded by Mr. Muspratt (in favour of the passing of the Franchise Bill).

Mr. Tyrer (Prescott) moved a second resolution protesting against the obstruction of the Franchise Bill by the House of Lords, and this was seconded by Mr. Sam Woods, of Ashton.

At No.2 Platform, Mr. R.D. Holt presided, supported by Mr. Henry Broadhurst, M.P., Mr. Tompkinson (Liberal candidate for West Cheshire), Dr. Wood (Mayor of Southport), Alderman Poulson (ex-Mayor of Bootle), and others.

On this platform the first resolution was moved by Dr. Wood and seconded by Mr. Enoch Edwards (president of the North Stafford Miners’ Association). The second resolution was moved by Mr. T.T. Hayes, J.P., of Leigh, and seconded by Mr. E.R. Russell, of Liverpool. Mr. Henry Broadhurst, M.P., (Stoke) supported.

At No. 3 Platform, Mr. Richard Pilkington (St. Helens) presided, and was supported by Messrs. S. Williamson (M.P. for the St. Andrew’s Boroughs), J.E. Johnson-Ferguson, Joseph Arch (Agricultural Labourers’ representative), Joseph Walton (Liverpool), Arthur Sinclair, and other gentlemen.

Mr. Johnson-Ferguson proposed the first resolution and Mr. Stephen Williamson, M.P., seconded. Mr. Joseph Arch supported.

Mr. S. Robinson (London) moved the second resolution, which was seconded by Mr. Sinclair (St. Helens).

In addition to the names mentioned, the following local gentlemen were on the various platforms: Messrs. C.A. Luffman, W. Gilmour, W. Urquhart, F. Clarke, M. Birkhead, G. Owen, Joseph Davies, D. Williams, T. Cooper, John Davies, and the Rev. W.C. Tayler.

On Wednesday afternoon, August 20th, 1884, the children of the day School connected with Sts. Mary and John’s Catholic Church, Newton, had their annual treat, upwards of 300 scholars proceeding from the school house to the grounds of Mr. John Mercer, the Woodlands, Ashton Road, kindly lent for the occasion.

On Monday evening, August 18th, 1884, a largely attended meeting of the parishioners of St. James’ Church, Haydock, was held in the church schoolroom, to welcome the new vicar, the rev. A.H. Kearney, formerly vicar of Coldham. The room had been tastefully decorated for the occasion by Mr. A. Evans. The Rev. G. Mason (curate) presided, supported by Messrs. Turnbull, A. Evans and E. Jackson.

The Print Works trip. The annual excursion to Liverpool of Messrs. McCorquodale’s employees took place on Saturday last (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of August 23rd, 1884), two special trains (heavily laden) departing from Newton Bridge at an early hour, and calling at Earlestown, where the number of excursionists was so augmented that over 2,000 made the journey.

The death occurred on Monday, August 18th, 1884, of Mr. Thomas Weaver, at Appleton Cheshire. Mr. Weaver, with his younger brother, the Rev. B. Weaver, worked for years very indefatigably in connection with the Brunswick Wesleyan Chapel, Earlestown, as Sunday School teacher, local preacher, etc.

On Wednesday evening, August 20th, 1884, a dinner was held in the Ram’s Head Hotel, Haydock, to celebrate the cutting of the first sod of the new shaft at Old Boston, Haydock, which ceremony had been performed by Mrs. Pilkington a fortnight previously. Mr. Arthur Evans presided, and Mr. B.B. Glover occupied the position of vice-president. There were also present Mr. W. Evans, Mrs. C. Pilkington, J.P., Mr. W. Balharry, Mr. Thomas Jackson, and all Messrs. Evans’ managers from Haydock, Golborne, Parr, Pewfall, Edge Green, etc.

At the conclusion of the dinner Mr. Roger Yates proposed the toast of the evening (“Success to the new colliery”), which was responded to by Mr. John Turton (manager of the Old Boston No. 1 Pit). Mr. Balarry proposed “The Firm,” coupling with it the name of Mr. W. Evans. Mr. Glover proposed “Mrs. Pilkington,” to which Mr. Pilkington responded.
Harmony occupied the remainder of the evening, amongst those contributing being Messrs. J. Forrest, W. Tither, W. Arnold, J. Jackson, and H. Wiswell.

Speaking at a meeting on Wednesday night, August 20th, 1884, at Earlestown, called to uphold the public rights of Newton Common, Miss Craigen (London) said she understood local common land was fast slipping away from the people. If the latter were disposed to stand up for their rights, she would help them. She would visit Earlestown on September 1st and go to the Common, if they would support her, and be the first to lay hands on the fences which had been erected there, and encourage the people of Earlestown to pull them up. It was supposed, she said, by some, that the fact of the people having paid 1/- for the grazing of their cattle was an admission of the right of the lord of the manor to the land, but those payments were regarded only as “dues” and did not constitute money payments or rents.

A short time previously, she added, a man built a house on common land, and summoned another man for going through his garden, but the Bench dismissed the summons on the ground that the house and the garden were trespassing, and not the man, because the land was the property of the people. That, she thought, was a strong case for the people of Earlestown to act upon and she hoped they would be ready to unite with her when she next came, in demanding the common land for the people.

The anniversary dinner of the Loyal Viaduct Lodge of Oddfellows was held at the Wellington Inn, Earlestown, on Saturday, August 30th, 1884, about 50 members sitting down to an excellent dinner, the catering for which was in the hands of P.G. J.W. [Unreadable]. After the tables had been cleared, P.P.G.M. James Dolan took the chair, the vice-chair being occupied by P.G. P. Connor. The chairman having proposed the customary loyal toasts, and P.P.G.M. T. Tunstall “the Army and Navy” (the toast being fully honoured), the toast of “the Manchester Unity” was proposed by P.G.M. Charles Hodgkinson. The toast of “The Viaduct Lodge” was proposed by Prov. G.M., C. Hodgkinson, who said he always esteemed it a privilege and pleasure to attend the meetings of the Lodge. Bro. Gill responded.

During the evening songs were sung by Bros. G. Wright, V.G. James Seddon, W. Sephton, R. Lythgoe, W. Mawdsley and G. Code. Recitations were also given by Bro. W. Sutton. After the usual votes of thanks, including one to Mr. H.J. Durman for presiding at the piano, the meeting closed with the singing of the National Anthem.

On Sunday, August 31st, 1884, special sermons were preached in the Golborne Congregational Church in aid of a fund for repairing the chapel yard, the cost of which was estimated at £60. The Rev. Mr. Hennessy was the preacher. The attendance at each service was good, and, along with private subscriptions, an amount within £12 of the required sum was realised.

[radman]

I hope you're all keeping up. Here's September...

The monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners should have been held on Monday, September 1st, 1884, but only one member of the Board turned up and the meeting was postponed.

The funeral of Mr. John Southward (82), of Newton, took place on Saturday last (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 6th, 1884). The deceased was an old Oddfellow, having joined the Good Intent Lodge, M.U., Newton, when it was first established in 1883, at which time Odd-fellowship was in its infancy, and was strongly denounced in the pulpit. Such was the prejudice which then existed against it that the members of the lodge were unable to secure a room to meet in at Newton, and had to secure one at Golborne Dale. The deceased was a treasurer of the Lodge for many years, and consequently upwards of 70 members of the Lodge attended the funeral. The procession was headed by Mr. J. Mussel, trustee, Mr. J. Houghton, treasurer, and Mr. J. Ball, secretary, and the officers of various bodies. The Rev. H. Monk conducted the burial service. At the conclusion of the funeral ceremony, the Oddfellows repaired to the lodge room where they partook of dinner. Mr. J. Mussel preside, and at the conclusion of the dinner, called upon P.P.G.M. J. Ball, who proposed a “melancholy” toast, viz., that they should drink to “the silent memory of the dear departed brother.” As they were aware, he said, Mr. Southward was, with one exception, the oldest resident of Newton living up to the time of his decease. The Southward family had been connected with newton and had lived in the same house as deceased during the past two centuries. The toast was drunk in silence, and the proceedings immediately afterwards terminated.

On Saturday, September 6th, 1884, upwards of 70 men and officers of the Lancashire Hussars, Ashton troop, partook of an excellent dinner provided by Lord Gerard, at the Gerard Arms Hotel. The chair was subsequently occupied by Quartermaster Sergeant Livesley, when the customary loyal and patriotic toasts were honoured, and the various officers, including Lord Gerard, were cordially “toasted.” The room was tastefully decorated and songs were sung by several members of the company.

The third annual dinner in connection with the Tontine Society, took place at the Griffin Hotel, Earlestown, on Saturday, September 6th, 1884, about 50 members partaking, the catering being satisfactorily done by Mr. James Lythgoe. The chair was subsequently taken by Mr. James Gilman, the vice-chair being occupied by Mr. J. Muscroft. The report was presented by the secretary, Mr. C. Audley, and showed the society to be in a flourishing condition. There were 79 members on the books, 30 of whom had joined during the last year.

The toast of the evening “Success to the Tontine Society” was proposed by Mr. A. Greatholder, and responded to by Mr. James Sharp. The vice-chairman proposed “hosts and hostes,” and Mr. J. Lythgoe replied. Songs were sung by Messrs. P. Hastie, J. Williams, Green, Harrison, E. Smith, Morris, Sharp, Muscroft, G. Jackson, and T. Saul.

The following letter appeared in the correspondence columns of the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 6th, 1884:—
Sir,—There has been some talk lately about the encroachment on Newton Common. If I may be allowed to express an opinion on the matter, I think the following would be a good settlement. If W.J. Legh, Esq., claims it and would allow it to be used as a public park I for one would subscribe £100 towards putting it in order—I mean, of course, the portion of it below the highway to St. Helens and the bottom end of Earle Street up to Mr. Emmett’s house, including the Dingle. The Dingle could be made to form no small addition in the way of attraction.—Yours, etc., “Justitia” P.S.—The long pit could be added to and made round so as to be double length, and very attractive.

On Saturday, September 6th, 1884, about 200 members of the Independent Order of Rechabites, Liverpool District, paid a visit to Newton and Earlestown. A procession had been arranged, but in consequence of the inclement weather, had to be abandoned, and the Congregational Schoolroom, which had been placed at their disposal by the Rev. J. Allatt, was used, tea being provided there by Mrs. Jackson, of Earlestown. A public meeting was afterwards held.

The first annual report of the Haydock Cottage Hospital (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 6th, 1884) has just been issued, and indicates, unmistakably that even during the short time it has been established, and despite the limited means which it possesses, the hospital has conferred very considerable benefit upon the district. The first patient was admitted in July, 1883, and during the first 12 months, 13 cases were treated. The hospital report was prepared by Miss Kate Hayward, who has taken a warm interest in the treatment from the first, and, the honorary officers are as follow: Medical Officer, Dr. T.E. Hayward; treasurer, C. Pilkington, Esq., J.P.; secretary, Mr. E. Jackson. The matron is Miss Laura Wilson, whose services are suitably acknowledged in the report.

At a monthly meeting of the Golborne Parochial Committee, held in Mr. Brewis’ office, Golborne, on Wednesday, September 10th, 1884, Mr. W. Mitchell occupied the chair, and there were also present Messrs. J. Taylor, D. Garton, W. Garton, T. Mitchell, and the Surveyor, Mr. C.S. Bennie.

After the confirming of the minutes the Surveyor said he desired instructions with regard to the subsidence at Brick Bridge, in Ashton Road.

Mr. I. Taylor said he thought the matter ought to be attended to as there was a considerable hollow in the road, in which water had collected. It was becoming a dangerous place.

The Surveyor said that Messrs. Evans and Co. were liable for the damage done to the road, but not for the sewers and water mains. They ought to be called upon to make good the damage. He could estimate this to within a few pounds as he possessed a plan of the road, and could tell exactly how far the subsidence had gone. The cost would be about £50, and it was not right that the committee should have to pay it.

The Surveyor was instructed to prepare an estimate of the damage, and to request compensation from Messrs. Evans.
The Surveyor stated that he had written to the railway company asking when the widening of the railway at Golborne would take place, and he had received a reply from Mr. E. Thornley, Euston Station, stating that Mr. Stephenson would probably be able to tell them when he returned to town.

On Saturday, September 13th, 1884, three Haydock residents were summonsed to appear at Newton Petty Sessions, charged with refusing to take supplies of wholesome tap water and obtaining it instead from wells. The summonses were taken out by William Cawley, Surveyor, on behalf of the Haydock Local Board, and he asked for closing orders in respect of the wells. The defendants had been served with notices, with which they had failed to comply.

The Bench granted the application in respect of the wells from which John Haseldine and Martha Fairclough were getting their supplies, but the third summons, which was against an elderly resident named Agnes Fairclough, who brought a bottle of the water to court, said she had drunk it for 23 years and considered it better than any tap water, was dismissed.

The defendant left the court inviting various policemen to taste her sample, and causing considerable amusement.
The first match of the season was played by the Earlestown A.F.C. (Stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 13th, 1884) at Haydock on Saturday last, when the runners-up of the Liverpool and District Challenge Cup (1883) met Haydock Temperance at Haydock. After a good game, Earlestown retired victorious by two goals to one. The rival sides were as follow: Earlestown.—J. Gray, goal; J. Whalley (capt.), and W. Rich, fullbacks; R. Bowker and H. Whalley, halves; J. Duxbury and H. Holcroft, right wing; J. Ellison and S. Williams, centres; J. Appleton and J. Cameron, left wing.

Haydock Temperance.—J. Green, goal; T. Hatton and J. Carter, fullbacks; A. Picton, J. Baines and T. Plant, halves; J. Blackley (capt.), and T. Owen, right wing; J. Picton, centre; P. Twist and J. Harrison, left wing.
The umpires were Mr. J. Hastie (Earlestown), and Mr. R. Evans (Haydock).

From the advertisement columns of the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 13th, 1884.

“To be let, Two Houses, top of Cross Lane, Earlestown; pleasantly situated; just beautified throughout; rent £14 and £18 respectively. Address, Mr. Needham, ironmonger, Queen Street, Earlestown.

The anniversary services in connection with the Earlestown Baptist Sunday School were held on Sunday last, stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 6th, 1884, the sermon being preacher by the Rev. E. Dwyer, of Atherton. In the evening, solos were sung by Miss Limond, Miss Lambert, and Mr. Holdsworth. The collections realised £14.

The monthly meeting of the Newton Commissioners, which could not be held on the first Monday in the month as sufficient members did not attend to form a quorum, was held on Monday, September 15th, 1884, when there were present: messrs. Gooch (chairman), Pardey, Emmett, Forster, Gillespie, Worsley (Law Clerk) and Brierley (Surveyor).

The chairman read a letter from Col. McCorquodale on the subject of his proposed retirement from the Board, in which the writer agreed in view of the indulgent manner in which the members looked upon his infrequent attendance, to remain on the Board.

Mr. Emmett asked what had been done with regard to the sewerage scheme.

The Chairman: The Committee met Mr. Pardey and several schemes were suggested apart from that which the Surveyor had outlined. It was left for another meeting to consider what additional cost (if any), the scheme which would better meet Mr. Pardey’s views would incur. The Committee has not yet met the second time, and I think it will be well to have an early meeting to go into the question again.

Mr. Emmett: The sooner the question is settled the better.

The Chairman: No decision was come to pending Mr. Brierley’s taking out sections and seeing how the proposed alterations would work out.

The Chairman then read a letter from Mr. Appleton resigning the post of bellman for the township of Newton.
The Surveyor said that the duties and the office had been recently done by proxy, by a man named Lovesey.

Mr. Pardey said that in his opinion the appointment of the bellman did not rest with the Board, but with the lord of the manor.

The subject then dropped, and there was no further business.

On Tuesday morning (stated the “Earlestown Guardian” of September 20th, 1884), a large crowd assembled in the vicinity of the Earlestown Baptist Church, to witness the ceremony of marriage between Mr. George Frederick Aveline, of 57, Cross Lane, Earlestown, and Miss Maria Swan, second daughter of Mr. William Swan, St. Helens. Both parties are widely known in the district, Miss Swan having up to a recent date carried on business as a milliner in Bridge Street, and Mr. Aveline being prominently connected with the Baptist Church. The chapel was packed almost to suffocation, several hundreds of people being unable to obtain admission. The ceremony was performed by the Rev. W.C. Tayler (pastor), the chapel choir, under the conductorship of Mr. Holdsworth, leading the choral service, and Mr. Eckersley accompanying on the harmonium.

On Monday evening, September 27th, 1884, the funeral took place of Mr. Samuel Arrowsmith, of Legh Street, Earlestown, who had been connected with the Primitive Methodist Chapel and Sunday School since the establishment of the cause in Earlestown. The funeral took place in Wargrave Churchyard and was conducted by the Rev. Canon Whitley.

There were upwards of 150 mourners at the funeral.

The Newton Choral Society held its sixth annual meeting in St. Peter’s Schoolroom in September, 1884, Dr. J.W. Watkins (vice-president) occupying the chair. The treasurer (Mr. Haskell) read the balance sheet, and Mr. Fairclough, the conductor, referred to the success of the Society during the season closed.

On Monday afternoon, September 29th, 1884, the lists of voters in the newton Polling District of the South-West Lancashire Division were revised by W.H. Butler, Esq., barrister, at the Newton Town Hall.

Prior to the commencement, the Revising Barrister stated that by some means a large number of notices of objection, addressed to different persons, and only placed in the Post Office at St. Helens, had been delivered to one individual at Widnes.

The postmaster at Warrington had been summoned to give an explanation. Mr. Broadhurst, who appeared on behalf of the Warrington postmaster, said the notices of objection were received from St. Helens tied loosely across the centre with a piece of twine, and after each notice had been duly stamped, they were sent on to Widnes in the condition in which they were received.—The Revising Barrister said the excuse at Widnes was that they were received from Warrington tied in a roll like an ordinary book parcel, and were delivered to the only visible address.—Mr. Broadhurst said the Warrington postmaster was asking the authorities at London to make an investigation into the matter.